Communication Breakdown-FAA

Mossad’s Use of Covert Communication Devices

The E-Team aka Mossad )Gelatin B-Thing), who were reportedly Israeli “art students” with access to the 91st floor of WTC 1 in the year prior to 9/11. This image shows a man from that group using a handheld transceiver, likely a type of encrypted or private-band walkie-talkie.

Here’s what stands out:

• Device in hand: The unit resembles Motorola or Kenwood UHF/VHF radios, popular among law enforcement, military contractors, and intelligence operatives for short-range encrypted communications.

• Significance: These radios can use custom frequencies, avoid interception, and allow communication with nearby teams—including airborne (helicopter) units.

• Context: Combined with their documented WTC access, photography of box cutters, and detailed floor plans, it raises red flags that intelligence agencies (including the FBI and DEA) quietly investigated post-9/11.

Let’s break it down:

1. The radio model types Mossad-affiliated teams have reportedly used.

2. The E-Team’s 91st floor access and ties to potential staging operations.

3. A visual map showing radio signal range from that floor

Mossad has a history of employing sophisticated communication methods for intelligence operations. For instance, in a decade-long operation, Mossad agents infiltrated Hezbollah’s communication networks by supplying booby-trapped pagers and walkie-talkies through shell companies. These devices were designed to detonate remotely, causing significant casualties and psychological impact on Hezbollah operatives .

While these operations showcase Mossad’s capabilities in manipulating communication devices, they were targeted actions against specific adversaries and do not provide evidence of involvement in the 9/11 attacks.

Communication with Mohamed Atta

There is no credible evidence to suggest that Mossad agents communicated with Mohamed Atta or any of the 9/11 hijackers. Investigations into the attacks have not uncovered links between Israeli intelligence and the hijackers’ planning or execution of the events. The 9/11 Commission Report and subsequent inquiries have not implicated Mossad in any capacity related to the attacks.

Potential for Communication Disruption

Mossad possesses the technical expertise to disrupt communications, as demonstrated in operations against Hezbollah. However, applying this capability to the context of 9/11 would require substantial evidence, which is currently absent. The communication breakdowns experienced during the attacks were attributed to overwhelmed systems and lack of interoperability among emergency services, rather than deliberate sabotage by external intelligence agencies.

Conclusion

While Mossad’s proficiency in covert operations and communication manipulation is well-documented, there is no substantiated evidence linking them to the 9/11 attacks through communication with Mohamed Atta or causing communication breakdowns during the events. Theories suggesting such involvement remain speculative and are not supported by official investigations or credible sources.